Critical Literature Review - 1925 Words

Critical Literature Review (Essay Sample) Content: Critical Literature SynthesisStudentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s NameInstitutional AffiliationIntroductionThe chief executive officer (CEO) is a very vital leader in any organization. He coordinates all the operations of the company and ensures that the organization achieves its goals and that every stakeholder is satisfied. As such, when the CEO is not performing his duties appropriately, the company may be at a great risk because the decisions arrived at will not be consistent with the objectives of the organization. In our case, the workplace problem that has been applied in the previous synthesis has been the weak leadership approaches by the organizationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s chief executive officer. The weak leadership has majorly been attributed to the application of traditional leadership styles and does not involve important stakeholders like employees in decision-making process. The major concern evidently presents itself as; decisions of leaders in a company should not be influenced by personal biases. Decisions that demands cautious judgment may at times be affected by individualà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s personal judgment, and this creates the need for leaders to learn the best methods to overcome such personal biases in managing the organization.Groupthink comes in handy when tackling the issue of decision-making by CEOà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s. Poor management as a result of leaderà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s personal judgment and poor decision-making has attracted the concerns of several authors. They have written books addressing and offering professional solutions to such poor decisions arrived at by such leaders. It has been noted that overconfidence is a major issue in a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s decision-making. Heuristics and psychological traps may have great influences in managerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s decision-making. This critical literature synthesis is a collection of the entire research causes, guidance and solutions offered for better decision-making by CEOà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬sOverconfidenceAccording to Beze rman and Moore (2008), overconfidence can result to prejudgment which occurs when leaders chose to ignore other vital information or other people. The two views critically analyze judgments that are made by leaders in the process of decision-making. They note the causes and influences that overconfidence by leaders may have in the entire process of decision-making. As a result of overconfidence, such leaders believe that they can settle for nothing but the right decisions without consultation. The same view is confirmed by Drummond (2001) who states that the illusion of over control is a significant influence on poor decision-making by leaders. Drummond defines Illusion of control is as the internal feeling that an individual is in full control and that their decision is not only right but final. As such, leaders who are overconfident in decision-making have no second thought about their decision, and this can be a potential risk to the organization. He is also keen to offer current organizational mistakes that leaders have caused. He also indicates that there are negative consequences of such illusions as well as overconfidence decisions.Heuristics and psychological obstaclesHammond, Keeny and Raiffa (1998) identified that there are certain heuristics along with psychological obstacles that have roles in the process of decision-making. They continued to highlight that there is a need to change approaches used in decision-making as a way of avoiding those obstacles and address the difficulties that leaders encounter in decision-making. The authors were keen to mention that red flag situations including inappropriate self-interest, distorting attachments and misleading memories. Availability of ineffective self-interest tends to raise biases that in turn increase the importance that leaders put on their information. It has been deduced that self-interest inappropriateness has led to biased decisions that even professional leaders have been unable to handle. Cro ker and Park (2004) also indicated that the availability, of distorting attachments by managers, can lead to poor decision-making. They mentioned that people have the tendency to being attached to others; places as well as things and such bonds influence the manner in which they engage in decision-making. In addition, they highlighted in their work that misleading memories have a huge influence on poor decisions made by leaders. Such memories eventually seem to be relevant and comparable to the present situations being faced by the leaders meaning that their thinking can be diverted to the wrong paths.Furthermore, Langer (1975) added information regarding illusion of control highlighting that psychology factors such as personality and societal influences have huge impacts on decisions made by leaders. Such leaders tend to behave in such a way that indicates that chance events are easily accessible to their personal control. Langer illustrated that the prominent illusion of control c auses individuals to behave in such a way as if they can coordinate chance situations whereby skill cues are available. In that case, the author used skill cues to indicate the elements of a situation that are associated with exercising a skill. On another note, Pfeffer and Fong (2005) went ahead to provide information on the need for self-enhancement focus along with the elements of power and influence. The authors strived to indicate that there is a crucial need for leaders to understand the extent to which they can use their power and influence in order to impact operations in organizations. Poor understanding of such elements can result in poor decision-making that has been noted in several organizations.Decision making trapsThe lack of sufficient time for a decision-making process is also a decision-making trap that has led to weak leadership results. The process, of making decisions in an organization, is a process that requires adequate time (Hammond, Keeney Raiffa, 1998). T he presence of adequate time for the process leads to the creation of better and informed decisions that will benefit an organization. Once there is not enough time, the process, of making decisions in an organization, is affected by the high probability of errors in the process. Therefore, a wrong decision is most likely to have several challenges. Evasion of the trap of the lack of adequate time is solved by finding time to make a decision (Laureate Education, 2012). Once the time for decision-making is allocated, quality decisions will be realized the organization hence will be successful.An unclear criterion for decision-making is another decision-making trap that CEOs face. The criterion of decision-making influences the prioritization of ideas in the process. Therefore, the criteria which are to be applied should be enhanced by priority settings. If an organization applies a criterion that is not friendly to the decision-making process, the organization is most likely to fall into a decision-making trap (Bazerman Moore, 2008). The remedy for the criterion trap is involvement of all parties with a stake in the decision in the determination of the best criterion to apply. The important concept of the criterion chosen is that the criterion should fall in organizational strategy of the organization (Drummond, 2001).Lack of relevant and logical methodologyMoreover, Drummond (2001) recognized that the main decision-making trap is the lack of relevant and logical methodology that enhances effective steps. Decision-making process requires an efficient methodology that will facilitate a quick and conclusive procedure. The methodology applied to an organization should be polished to ensure that there is no error that occurs at any step in the process. Irrelevant decision-making methodology is a common error that most organizations have committed. An organization with an irrelevant decision-making process has unorganized steps of making choices. Prioritization in such a case is a problem for the organization. Logical methodologies for decision-making should be implemented carefully to ensure that the organization is stable in its activities (Bazerman Moore, 2008). Illogical decision-making can be easily sorted out by a company. The methodology should be enhancing steps that are collaborative in decisions-generating process (Bazerman Moore, 2008). For relevancy, the process should have a win-win or a principle-based system driven by negation. In addition, for a permanent solution, delegation and majority voting should be involved in the process (Drummond, 2001).BiasnessAccording to (Andersen, 2003), biasness is a representation of another trap that is a risk in the decision-making process. The parties involved in the decision-making process are sensitive in determining whether the process is biased or not (Bazerman Witkins, 2008). Biases of parties in a meeting are mainly contributed by taking prior stands by people in the meeting. The pos itions taken by the members in a meeting is a sentimental factor for the nature of the decisions an organization makes. So as to evade the risk of the biases trap in an organization, the parties in an organizationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s meeting should avoid being overwhelmed by their positions in the meeting (Bazerman Watkins, 2008). The members of the meeting should be selectively chosen to ensure that the meeting is not biased-based.Inadequate informationInadequate information is a trap that occurs in the decision-making process (Bazerman Moore 2008). Decision-making should be a process based on rich information sources that are highly dependable. If a decision-making process lacks adequate information, weak leadership is likely to venture into it. Therefore, a remedy to inadequate information source is provision of information sources to the organization in the decision-making process. Once the information in t... Critical Literature Review - 1925 Words Critical Literature Review (Essay Sample) Content: Critical Literature SynthesisStudentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s NameInstitutional AffiliationIntroductionThe chief executive officer (CEO) is a very vital leader in any organization. He coordinates all the operations of the company and ensures that the organization achieves its goals and that every stakeholder is satisfied. As such, when the CEO is not performing his duties appropriately, the company may be at a great risk because the decisions arrived at will not be consistent with the objectives of the organization. In our case, the workplace problem that has been applied in the previous synthesis has been the weak leadership approaches by the organizationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s chief executive officer. The weak leadership has majorly been attributed to the application of traditional leadership styles and does not involve important stakeholders like employees in decision-making process. The major concern evidently presents itself as; decisions of leaders in a company should not be influenced by personal biases. Decisions that demands cautious judgment may at times be affected by individualà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s personal judgment, and this creates the need for leaders to learn the best methods to overcome such personal biases in managing the organization.Groupthink comes in handy when tackling the issue of decision-making by CEOà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s. Poor management as a result of leaderà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s personal judgment and poor decision-making has attracted the concerns of several authors. They have written books addressing and offering professional solutions to such poor decisions arrived at by such leaders. It has been noted that overconfidence is a major issue in a companyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s decision-making. Heuristics and psychological traps may have great influences in managerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s decision-making. This critical literature synthesis is a collection of the entire research causes, guidance and solutions offered for better decision-making by CEOà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬sOverconfidenceAccording to Beze rman and Moore (2008), overconfidence can result to prejudgment which occurs when leaders chose to ignore other vital information or other people. The two views critically analyze judgments that are made by leaders in the process of decision-making. They note the causes and influences that overconfidence by leaders may have in the entire process of decision-making. As a result of overconfidence, such leaders believe that they can settle for nothing but the right decisions without consultation. The same view is confirmed by Drummond (2001) who states that the illusion of over control is a significant influence on poor decision-making by leaders. Drummond defines Illusion of control is as the internal feeling that an individual is in full control and that their decision is not only right but final. As such, leaders who are overconfident in decision-making have no second thought about their decision, and this can be a potential risk to the organization. He is also keen to offer current organizational mistakes that leaders have caused. He also indicates that there are negative consequences of such illusions as well as overconfidence decisions.Heuristics and psychological obstaclesHammond, Keeny and Raiffa (1998) identified that there are certain heuristics along with psychological obstacles that have roles in the process of decision-making. They continued to highlight that there is a need to change approaches used in decision-making as a way of avoiding those obstacles and address the difficulties that leaders encounter in decision-making. The authors were keen to mention that red flag situations including inappropriate self-interest, distorting attachments and misleading memories. Availability of ineffective self-interest tends to raise biases that in turn increase the importance that leaders put on their information. It has been deduced that self-interest inappropriateness has led to biased decisions that even professional leaders have been unable to handle. Cro ker and Park (2004) also indicated that the availability, of distorting attachments by managers, can lead to poor decision-making. They mentioned that people have the tendency to being attached to others; places as well as things and such bonds influence the manner in which they engage in decision-making. In addition, they highlighted in their work that misleading memories have a huge influence on poor decisions made by leaders. Such memories eventually seem to be relevant and comparable to the present situations being faced by the leaders meaning that their thinking can be diverted to the wrong paths.Furthermore, Langer (1975) added information regarding illusion of control highlighting that psychology factors such as personality and societal influences have huge impacts on decisions made by leaders. Such leaders tend to behave in such a way that indicates that chance events are easily accessible to their personal control. Langer illustrated that the prominent illusion of control c auses individuals to behave in such a way as if they can coordinate chance situations whereby skill cues are available. In that case, the author used skill cues to indicate the elements of a situation that are associated with exercising a skill. On another note, Pfeffer and Fong (2005) went ahead to provide information on the need for self-enhancement focus along with the elements of power and influence. The authors strived to indicate that there is a crucial need for leaders to understand the extent to which they can use their power and influence in order to impact operations in organizations. Poor understanding of such elements can result in poor decision-making that has been noted in several organizations.Decision making trapsThe lack of sufficient time for a decision-making process is also a decision-making trap that has led to weak leadership results. The process, of making decisions in an organization, is a process that requires adequate time (Hammond, Keeney Raiffa, 1998). T he presence of adequate time for the process leads to the creation of better and informed decisions that will benefit an organization. Once there is not enough time, the process, of making decisions in an organization, is affected by the high probability of errors in the process. Therefore, a wrong decision is most likely to have several challenges. Evasion of the trap of the lack of adequate time is solved by finding time to make a decision (Laureate Education, 2012). Once the time for decision-making is allocated, quality decisions will be realized the organization hence will be successful.An unclear criterion for decision-making is another decision-making trap that CEOs face. The criterion of decision-making influences the prioritization of ideas in the process. Therefore, the criteria which are to be applied should be enhanced by priority settings. If an organization applies a criterion that is not friendly to the decision-making process, the organization is most likely to fall into a decision-making trap (Bazerman Moore, 2008). The remedy for the criterion trap is involvement of all parties with a stake in the decision in the determination of the best criterion to apply. The important concept of the criterion chosen is that the criterion should fall in organizational strategy of the organization (Drummond, 2001).Lack of relevant and logical methodologyMoreover, Drummond (2001) recognized that the main decision-making trap is the lack of relevant and logical methodology that enhances effective steps. Decision-making process requires an efficient methodology that will facilitate a quick and conclusive procedure. The methodology applied to an organization should be polished to ensure that there is no error that occurs at any step in the process. Irrelevant decision-making methodology is a common error that most organizations have committed. An organization with an irrelevant decision-making process has unorganized steps of making choices. Prioritization in such a case is a problem for the organization. Logical methodologies for decision-making should be implemented carefully to ensure that the organization is stable in its activities (Bazerman Moore, 2008). Illogical decision-making can be easily sorted out by a company. The methodology should be enhancing steps that are collaborative in decisions-generating process (Bazerman Moore, 2008). For relevancy, the process should have a win-win or a principle-based system driven by negation. In addition, for a permanent solution, delegation and majority voting should be involved in the process (Drummond, 2001).BiasnessAccording to (Andersen, 2003), biasness is a representation of another trap that is a risk in the decision-making process. The parties involved in the decision-making process are sensitive in determining whether the process is biased or not (Bazerman Witkins, 2008). Biases of parties in a meeting are mainly contributed by taking prior stands by people in the meeting. The pos itions taken by the members in a meeting is a sentimental factor for the nature of the decisions an organization makes. So as to evade the risk of the biases trap in an organization, the parties in an organizationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s meeting should avoid being overwhelmed by their positions in the meeting (Bazerman Watkins, 2008). The members of the meeting should be selectively chosen to ensure that the meeting is not biased-based.Inadequate informationInadequate information is a trap that occurs in the decision-making process (Bazerman Moore 2008). Decision-making should be a process based on rich information sources that are highly dependable. If a decision-making process lacks adequate information, weak leadership is likely to venture into it. Therefore, a remedy to inadequate information source is provision of information sources to the organization in the decision-making process. Once the information in t...